A scoping review identifies multiple emerging knowledge synthesis methods, but few studies operationalize the methods
Tricco AC, Soobiah C, Antony J, Cogo E, MacDonald H, Lillie E, Tran J, D’Souza J, Hui W, Perrier L, Welch V, Horsley T, Straus SE, Kastner M. A scoping review identifies multiple emerging knowledge synthesis methods, but few studies operationalize the method. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 May;73:19-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.08.030.
[sidebar] Funder: Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) [no-bottom-margin] [/no-bottom-margin]
Share Buttons [span][/span]
[ssba-buttons] [/sidebar] [sidebar-content]- The results of this scoping review can be used to inform a research agenda to advance these methods in the knowledge synthesis field
- Twelve knowledge synthesis methods were classified as methods that can be used for the entire synthesis process; while 13 were classified as methods that provide guidance on the analysis alone
- Identified a lack of guidance in emerging knowledge synthesis methods integrating qualitative and quantitative evidence
Altmetrics:
Related Projects:
- Knowledge synthesis methods: introduction to series
- Knowledge synthesis methods: integrating qualitative and quantitative data
- Knowledge synthesis methods: generating or refining theory
- Knowledge synthesis methods: selecting the most appropriate method
- Knowledge synthesis methods: analysis of research on emerging methods
Category : KS Projects
Date : 04 Sep 2020