Knowledge synthesis methods for generating or refining theory: a scoping review reveals that little guidance is available
Tricco AC, Antony J, Soobiah C, Kastner M, Cogo E, MacDonald H, D’Souza J, Hui W, Straus SE. Knowledge synthesis methods for generating or refining theory: a scoping review reveals that little guidance is available. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 May;73:36-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.11.021.
[sidebar] Funder: Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) [no-bottom-margin] [/no-bottom-margin]
Share Buttons [span][/span]
[ssba-buttons] [/sidebar] [sidebar-content]- The results of this scoping review can be used to inform a research agenda to advance these methods in the knowledge synthesis field
- Nine knowledge synthesis methods (e.g., concept synthesis, critical interpretive synthesis, integrative review, meta-ethnography, meta-interpretation, meta-study, meta-synthesis, narrative synthesis, and realist review) were identified in the literature for the purpose of generating and refining theory
- Guidance for conducting these emerging knowledge synthesis methods are often vague and sometimes absent
Altmetrics:
Related Projects:
- Knowledge synthesis methods: introduction to series
- Knowledge synthesis methods: emerging methods
- Knowledge synthesis methods: integrating qualitative and quantitative data
- Knowledge synthesis methods: selecting the most appropriate method
- Knowledge synthesis methods: analysis of research on emerging methods
Category : KS Projects
Date : 07 Sep 2020