Retrospective Comparison

Home Retrospective Comparison

    A Retrospective Comparison of Systematic Reviews with Same-Topic Rapid Reviews

    Reynen E, Robson R, Ivory J, Hwee J, Straus SE, Pham B, Tricco AC. A retrospective comparison of systematic reviews with same-topic rapid reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2018 Apr;96:23-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.12.001.

     

    Funder: Canada Research Chairs Program (CRCP) and Ontario Ministry of Research, Innovation, and Science Early Researcher Award (2015 to 2020) awarded to Dr. Andrea Tricco

    Click to Download

     

    Share Buttons

    [ssba-buttons]
    • Highlighted that a prospective design comparing rapid reviews and systematic reviews is the more appropriate approach for addressing questions regarding a rapid review’s validity, efficiency, and general suitability as an alternative to a systematic review
    • Systematic reviews and rapid reviews reported similar conclusions, but rapid reviews tend to use abbreviated methods, provide less detail and fewer considerations
    • Challenging to discern methodological differences because of retrospective assessment and substantial non-reporting, particularly for rapid reviews

    Almetrics:

    Category :

    Date : 10 Dec 2019

    Copyright © 2019 Knowledge Translation Program